kanick

Home » 2013 » April

Monthly Archives: April 2013

Cheddar Bay Leaderboard

.

Who won the draft? The usual suspects.

happy

Clockwise from top left: Giants fans, Steelers fans, Packers fans, Ravens fans.

Kanick didn’t like the Browns draft.  Offered up some reasons why… but it turns out I, as an expert, am not persuasive.

Instead of flogging that dead horse, I thought it’d be interesting to compare the Banner draft with some other GMs.  Other, proven, really good*, GMs:

  • Jerry Reese (Giants GM, 2007)
  • Ted Thompson (Packers GM, 2005)
  • Kevin Colbert (Steelers GM, 2000)
  • Tom Dimitroff (Falcons GM, 2008)
  • Ozzie Newsome (Ravens GM, 2002)

How did they approach their draft?  Did they look for holes in their roster and fix em?  Did they go for luxury picks (a.k.a, BPA)?  If so, in what rounds did they ‘splurge?’

And as an academic matter, I’ll add in the needs assessment for the teams that I derived by looking at their depth chart on April 5.  It’s not comprehensive..  but if I can identify a need, it’s probably a need.

.

I’ll just cut to the chase.  All of these GMs who are smarter than me, you, and -if we’re looking at the records- Joe Banner,

They share these commonalities in their drafts.

  • They addressed team needs in their first two rounds.
  • None of their top picks will un-seat a young productive player.
  • Their first rounders are projected as immediate three down starters.

The Browns’ draft can’t tick the box on any of these goals.

[Note:  I did NOT cherry pick these five.  These were the first five GMs that came to mind as the best.]

______

Screen Shot 2013-04-30 at 4.30.01 PM

Always good to draft your iconic logo.

Jerry Reese (Giants GM, 2007).  
LB, O-line, S

1 19 Justin Pugh T
2 49 Johnathan Hankins DT
3 81 Damontre Moore DE
4 110 Ryan Nassib QB
5 152 Cooper Taylor S
7 225 Eric Herman G
7 253 Michael Cox RB

No one had Pugh rated that highly but Reese is the guy who ‘reached’ for Jason Pierre-Paul.  And it addresses a need with Diehl’s age (and DUI).  Protect the franchise QB.  Smart.

Marvin Austin has been disappointing and Hankins looks like a shot fired across the bow.  Getting a top five player on game film in the 3rd is good; getting a possible franchise QB in the fourth is good.

And the need-addressing safety is 6’4″. (more…)

Your 2013 depth chart.

Screen Shot 2013-04-29 at 3.07.52 PM
Here’s your depth chart.  You can read it same as me.  Pretty much the same amount of red and yellow as at the start of the off-season.  Good depth on the d-front.  Yay.

_____
Traded out of 4th and 5th rounds?  No biggie.

In case there’s any lingering confusion about the value of 4th/5th picks, here are alumni of those rounds who were significant contributors to last year’s playoff teams:

  • J.Rodgers, Nicholas (Falcons);
  • Sopoaga, Goldson (Niners);
  • Lang, Sitton (Packers);
  • Cousins, Riley, Lichtensteiger (Skins);
  • Wright, Sherman, Chancellor, Giacomini, R.Bryant (Seahawks);
  • Brinkley, Robison (Vikes);
  • Dumervil, Koppen, Tamme (Broncos);
  • Hernandez, Mesko, Gostkowski, Ninkovich, Lloyd (Pats);
  • Jones, Quin, Casey, O.Daniels (Texans);
  • Pitta, L.McClain, McPhee (Ravens);
  • Ballard, Mathis (Colts);
  • Boling, Atkins, Peko, Geathers (Bengals).

So let’s cool it on the jive that those picks don’t matter.

Walking away from that talent pool with all the red on the depth chart is tantamount to punting on the 2013 season. (more…)

Commitment to non-Excellence.

Screen Shot 2013-04-28 at 5.38.32 AM

Can’t say he didn’t warn us.

We’re not going 13-3 next year.

Can’t disagree, Jimmy.  That fate seems well-settled now.  With the league’s smallest salary cap number and a draft that failed to address any team needs, there is indeed little chance for thirteen wins.

But with a team who has been speaking down to us about building through the draft, and that we should avert our eyes from the Mike-Brown-esque payroll… the trading out of this year’s draft is the NFL equivalent of Berea dragging their ass on our carpets.

Haslam-Banner preaching practice is fine and dandy but, if you don’t mind, let’s not act like striving for the Super Bowl this year would have been so absurd.  Let’s challenge the premise of ‘We must suck more before we can be good.’  There is plenty of precedent for poor teams to improve year-over-year.  Hell, here’s a list  of sub .500 teams* who won the Super Bowl in the following year.

Joe Banner on your living room carpet.

  • 2000 Pats, 5-11; 2001 SB Champs
  • 1998 Rams, 4-12; 1999 SB Champs
  • 1980 Niners, 6-10; 1981 SB Champs

Even a Super Bowl appearance would be a goal worth having:

  • 2002 Panthers, 7-9; 2003 SB loser
  • 1999 Giants, 7-9; 2000 SB loser
  • 1997 Falcons, 7-9; 1998 SB loser
  • 1995 Pats, 6-10; 1996 SB loser
  • 1987 Bengals, 4-11; 1988 SB loser
  • 1980 Bengals, 6-10; 1981 SB loser

Just wanted to set that straight.  No.  We don’t have to suck in order to build and grow.  We do, though, need to address problem areas on the roster during the off-season.

Buster+Skrine+Cleveland+Browns+v+New+York+QYYvAWcpvonx

Problem: 5’9″
Solution: sign 5’9″ FA CB and draft 5’9″ CB.

_____
What were the team needs and how were they addressed?

We’ve bludgeoned all these in earlier posts:

  1. Cornerback is manned by Buster Skrine and his size limits his abilities.
  2. Free safety was handled ineffectively by Usama Young.
  3. Guards include competent Jason Pinkston whose health is still questionable and below average Sean Lauvao.  2014 UFA, journeyman John Greco shapes up as the top guard.
  4. Tight end has unproven Jordan Cameron.
  5. Fullback has no starter.
  6. And the [needless] adoption of Horton’s 3-4 created a need at ILB, now covered by undrafted FA Craig Robertson.

That’s six positions of need.  And we’re not even dealing with MKC’s assertion that we need two starting WRs or other noise about kickers and punters and quarterbacks.

How have the needs been addressed?

  1. Ignored dozens of CBs in free-agency, including at least ten who would be taller than any currently on the roster.  Signed 5’9″ Chris Owen to one year contract.  Drafted 5’9″ Leon McFadden in the third round who is equally short and considerably slower than the current liability at CB, Buster Skrine.  (No offense Buster.)
  2. Cut Usama Young.  Ignored safeties in FA.  Selected a safety in the sixth round who is currently re-habbing a blown Achilles.
  3. Drafted Tackle** Garrett Gilkey with pick #227.
  4. Signed two back-up tight ends in FA, neither of whom are known to exploit the center seam which is sought after now for the tight-end-as-a-weapon role.
  5. Unaddressed.
  6. Unaddressed.

By my math, that’s zero success at upgrading positions of need. (more…)

Analytics? Shamalytics.

Screen Shot 2013-04-27 at 11.16.45 AM

You don’t need an advanced degree in Mathematics from MIT to read this chart.

.

There are 56 6’4″ and better WRs today.  Five years ago there were 31.

.

Screen Shot 2013-04-27 at 9.22.19 AM

The Big Data promise of Scheiner.
Turns out he’s more of a scoreboard purchaser than an applying-data-to-talent-acquisition guy.

News item:  Huge cornerback Tharold Simon drafted by Seahawks two days after arrest for “public intimidation, resisting an officer and unnecessary noise.”
Lessons:  Big cornerbacks are valuable; the best defense in the NFL knows this; the Browns do not.

.

After much ballyhoo about our team hiring an MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference stalwart as CEO, it’s apparent that Mr. Banner does not let the CEO in the draft war room.

Wasn’t there a whole lot of happy talk about advanced analytics helping the Browns?

Didn’t we all assume these principle would be applied to talent acquisition?

Maybe someone should have taken a harder look… because from here it looks like Scheiner’s contribution will be bigger scoreboards.

And by ignoring even the simplest set of data as shown at the top, the numbers on the scoreboard are likely to look the same as they have for decades.

.

_____
What was the #1 need of the 2012 Browns?

We’ve been through this.

Buster+Skrine+Cleveland+Browns+v+New+York+QYYvAWcpvonx

McFadden gonna cover some asses too.

But I’ll repeat:  our defensive backfield was bad.  Usama Young was horrible.  Sheldon Brown got injured.  Buster Skrine played hard but was exploited by tall receivers.  Say again:  Skrine was always in position; Skrine cannot cover NFL WRs because he’s too short.

There was no need to improve the strongest part of the team, but fine:  we have a one-year Defensive Coordinator who wants to run his special system and needs to acquire three free-agents and use the #6 pick to re-do the perfectly good front line.

But fine… we’re fans and you can tell us anything and we’ll believe it because we HAVE TO.  So… ok:

CAN’T HAVE ENOUGH PASS RUSHERS.

Fine.

Fine fine fine.

fine

(more…)

WWHE #3: Mingo fills biggest need.

Screen Shot 2013-04-26 at 7.25.41 AM

.

pre-draft depth

Red is need. We drafted a green.

Why we hate ESPN:  they don’t even read their OWN research.

And this is the good stuff.  Behind the pay wall.  INSIDER.

I know we’re all going to be alright, but think of all the twelve years old boys who rely on ESPN for their talking points in middle school.

On the pick:  I liked Mingo in college.  Was really disruptive in the Chik-Fil-A loss (even though his stats don’t show it).  Terrorized Boyd all game.

I’d be all in on Mingo if we hadn’t just SIGNED TWO FREE-AGENT EDGE RUSHERS AND MOVED OUR BEST PASS RUSHER TO THE POSITION MINGO PLAYS.

Grade: Harumph. (more…)

The other investigation.

Still open.

.

They’ve had no issue with suppliers and their stores have remained open.

Did anyone else take notice when Jimmy Haslam (in the press conference embedded below) sought to allay concerns about PFJ’s health by noting that none of his stores closed in the immediate aftermath of the FBI/IRS action?  That PFJ was able to maintain a supply of diesel fuel to all its shops (although something something Minneapolis something something)?

Were you – like me – thinking:  Wait.. WHAT?  Isn’t that your business?  How is this even on the table?  And, NO, I do not feel better about the health of your company for having had this assurance.  I’m going to circle back to this point, but first:

That was a flag and there have been others.

  • Its largest competitor in the truck-stop travel center business, Flying J, went bankrupt in 2009.
  • Not buying the Browns outright with 35% (~$367,500,000) due to Randy Lerner in 2016.
  • Wresting the ‘player lowest salary cap hit’ crown away from the Bengals’ Mike Brown.
  • And now a Moody’s review of all its PFJ ratings, including the previously-downgraded Probability of Default rating.

I’m not a financial analyst or an MBA; open invite to any in the audience who can add insight to this.

But let’s take a look at what – for Browns fans worried about whether or not Jimmy Haslam will be the owner long-term – is the more serious investigation.

A Moody’s action will do more to force a Browns sale than rebate fraud.

.

Screen Shot 2013-04-25 at 6.27.20 AM

Click for link to Moody’s. Registration required.

_____
Navigating Moody’s

All the data I’m putting forward is straight from Moody’s.  You can access the same data, you just have to register.  Screen-cap above is linked to the research reports found dating back to the Flying J acquisition in 2009.

The initial report says:

Proceeds from the proposed bank revolver and term loans will be used to re-finance existing debt and partially fund Pilot’s acquisition of the travel center assets of Flying J Travel Centers (Flying J) for approximately $1.845 billion.

That’s $2,000,000,000 in debt for the Flying J ‘merger.’  I’ve been unable to find the cost to Pilot for taking on bankrupt Flying J.  The FTC did order PFJ to sell 20 travel centers to competitor Love’s but I have no idea on the cash that would bring in.

_____
First downgrade:  Probable Default Rating (PDR). (more…)

Reaches and values.

Screen Shot 2013-04-24 at 11.21.31 AM

Hours of number crunching has confirmed only one thing: The Enigma of Berkeley.

.

After my Ogletree pick (and my earlier Rhodes pick), I got thinking about the idea of ‘reaching’ on picks in the NFL Draft.

After all:  the value of pick is established by an imaginary market comprised of dozens/hundreds of reporters/bloggers/analysts who know markedly less than the football people who are determined to be overpaying.

It’s absurd and we do it every year.

Tyson Alualu is a reach.  Brian Bulaga is value.

I thought I’d take a look at how it goes when we annually fall into this trap.  Let’s compare a mock database to the actual picks taken that year.  Let’s see if there’s anything to the ‘reaches’ and ‘values’ assessments that are laid down.

.

The dicey part of this is finding old mocks.  Our friends at WalterFootball still have their old mocks up going back to 2003.  That is why I chose Walter as the arbiter for ‘reach’ and ‘value.’

.

Credit where it is due.

On a quick tangent, let me take a moment to congratulate Walter on their accuracy.  

Out of 322 first round picks since 2003, 211 were +/-6 of the actual pick.  That’s 65.5% of the time they’re hitting the mark.  63 times nailed it.

There are no metrics on mocks so we can’t say with certainty that that’s great… but it seems great to me.  There are misses (mocked Quinn to the Browns at 3 in 2007), but there’s also a few hits (DHB to the Raiders at 7 in 2009).  And sometimes they get it more right than the pros (mocked all-pro Beatty 20th in 2009; he fell to the Giants late in second round).  

For the most inexact of sciences, I’ll give them a ‘job well done’ rating.

.

For our purposes we’ll just say that if you pick someone twelve slots higher than the mock, it’s a reach.  Twelve slots lower, it’s value.

I only looked at the first round.  So if someone was mocked in the second or third round, I’m saying their mock position is 33.  That’s why Alualu (mocked at #53, taken at #10) isn’t far and away the Reach Champion.  Likewise, the best value picks are in the second, third, etc., rounds.  I don’t account for those here either.

If you’re interested in the raw data, here’s the messy spreadsheet.  

I’ll keep the whole list in the sidebar for reference for the next couple days.

(more…)

KKE #5. Euclid selects Alec Ogletree.

Euclid smiles.

 
Fifth in a series of collaborations with Reboot’s Dave Kolonich.  Earlier KKE’s:
KKE on cornerbacks: Kanick  Kolonich;  Pick your sleepers:  Kanick  Kolonich.
 
UPDATE:  Kolonich eschews logic in his demolition of my theorems, here.  He’s got Star Lotulelei.

.

Dave and I can squeeze in one more KKE before Thursday, so let’s just cut to the chase:

Who will the Browns take and why?

Banner-Lombardi obfuscation successfully trips up draft wonks. Except for Kanick. I see you Alec Ogletree. I’ll take you at #6 if I can’t trade back.

We’re into the fun part.  The smoke show.  After months of top ten, Dee Milliner is now damaged goods.  Geno Smith could slide to second round if not taken by Jacksonville.  The Browns are intrigued with Tavon Austin and Geno Smith.  Fluker will go before Warmack.  Cordarrelle Patterson has not the math skills to run a curl route.

You name the name, there is smoke.

As pertains to the Browns, the smoke is most heavy and the path is unknowable.  In spite of their history, Haslam/Lombardi are hard to read.  New coaching staff, no one knows who holds sway in the draft room.  We’re not even sure if the coaches have great reads on the existing roster.

This has led to reports indicating the Browns will select Jordan, Ansah, Milliner, Austin, Eifert, Floyd, Lotulelei, Smith.  (And Rhodes by me.)  As well as endless trade-down scenarios.

.

Let’s apply geometric logic to this problem and clear away the smoke.  Narrow the possibilities.  First:  the prevailing smoke.

1.  Can’t have too many 6’3″/300 d-tackles; pass-rushers; defensive front personnel in general.

This is preposterous.  Of course you can have too many pass rushers.  Of course you draft draft for need when you’re a 5-11 team.

Just look at the talent already assembled for Horton’s five man front.  The investments of dollars and draft picks.  It’s rock solid.

Screen Shot 2013-04-23 at 10.28.11 AM

Department of Redundancy Department.

If you’re the Niners or Seahawks and don’t have holes elsewhere, THEN you can do a BPA.  The Browns though?  More top defensive front personnel are luxuries they can’t afford.

We’re good at the defensive front.

It makes no sense to get another OLB, DE, DT with the other holes in the roster.

It makes EVEN LESS sense when you factor in there will be no trade down.  Hell, even the Dolphins are looking to trade back.

Browns have five holes and if they get three starters in the draft it’s a homerun.

Don’t be drafting guys where you have starters.

Screen Shot 2013-04-23 at 7.48.34 PM

No sex in the Champagne Room.

Euclid wouldn’t.

.

.

2.  It’s a QB league; you have to find your franchise QB and if he’s there at six, you take him.

Has Chudzinski found his next Cam?

Cleveland Browns reportedly want to draft new QB

Pfft.  Let’s give last year’s first round pick a chance to work in a non-remedial offense.  The reports from the mini-camp are all positive. (more…)

KKE #3. Pick your sleeper(s).

Screen Shot 2013-04-21 at 9.05.41 AM

If I have to pick… give me Knile Davis in the 5th; Ricky Wagner in the 6th; Kenny Tate in the 7th. Sorry Denard.

.

Time for another Kolonich/Kanicki Exchange.  This weekend, we thought it’d be interesting to explore the world of sleeper draft prospects.  For these purposes, we’re defining ‘sleeper’ as someone projected to be taken in rounds 5/6/7.

I couldn’t just take one.  (Sorry Dave.)  I’m going to rank my sleepers and they shake out like this:

  1. Knile Davis, RB, Arkansas;
  2. Kenny Tate, SS, Maryland;
  3. Ricky Wagner, OT/OG, Wisconsin.

with several honorable mentions.

_____
My method and pool.

For a pool,  I’m consulting Sobo’s Top 300 listing* and going with his names after 150 as my pool.  Bad idea, Sobo’s too good; precious few ‘sleepers’ residing sub-150 on his board.  Instead, I pulled Drafttek’s Top 400 and loaded them in a google spreadsheet here.

Let’s get one thing out of the way up front:  I’m the ultimate ‘casual draft wonk’ if that makes sense.  I’m not the guy looking at tape of a 100 players; but that won’t stop me from having a strong opinion on guys I have seen and like.  (For example, I was a major advocate for Justin Boren a couple years ago.  A rare miss.)  I know that doesn’t make sense on the surface, but with so many misses by the experts … anyone can be an expert.

Here’s who I liked in going through the back-end of that linked spreadsheet.

Screen Shot 2013-04-21 at 7.47.46 AM

Kanick’s eyeball sleepers.

_____
The prospect reviews.

Let’s work through these guys.

Knile Davis.  Dude weighs 227 and ran 4.37.  Injuries?  Broken ankle in 2011.  Well.. yeah, that’s why he’s 155 on your board.  But says here he picked up 1300 yards in 2010; tops in the SEC as a freshman.  I swear:  three hundredths of a second slower than Tavon Austin and 50 pound heavier.  And 31 bench reps.  Austin projecting in top 15; Davis fifth round (by this board).  Scouts cite fumbling and he plays, ‘soft and timid.’  After reviewing all the guys on this post, Davis is my top ‘sleeper.’  Good review of Davis here.

Denard Robinson.  This is a simple, ‘What do your eyes tell you?’  We’ve see him for four years in the Big 10.  He’s been nothing but baller.  Teams MUST game plan for him  We’ve established that there is no ‘playmaker’ position that you can draft.  But if there were, Denard Robinson would rate high in that positional ranking.  However, he would NOT rate highly if we were ranking baseball pitchers.

Everyone loved Wagner two years ago.
Was it playing with Zeitler, Konz, and Carimi? Or is he being underrated now?

Jake Stoneburner.  Always reliable, good hands, blocks… very Ohio State-ish tight end.  Who saw a 4.65 40 coming out of him?  If Stoneburner can run seam routes on top of everything else, that makes him Heath Miller which is terrific in the sixth round.

(I like Jack Doyle from WKU a lot too, but he wasn’t in drafttek’s top 400.  I checked with drafttek; they informed it was not an oversight.  Sorry, Jack.)

Ricky Wagner.  Two years ago Wagner so impressed with his dominating Rose Bowl against TCU, I screen capped the hole that John Clay got to run through.  He was playing guard on that team (Carimi, Konz, Zeitler were on that line too.  Mother of God, can you imagine??).  Anyway, I don’t know why Wagner is not beloved since that year, I really don’t.  This is another trusting of my eyes and I think Wagner will be starting in the NFL for a long time.  Maybe at guard?

Admitted: soft spot for discus-trained d-linemen.

Lawrence Okoye.  6’6″/280 308 and nothing but athlete.  I’m big on the pure athlete and I’m not the only one.  Last year’s recipient of Draft Highlight Video of the Year*** was taken in the sixth round by Bill Belichick.  Okoye’s got a track and field background and in an unpublished Margus Hunt paean, I checked into other track and field guy, here’s what I found:

  • Billy Winn, state runner-up (NV) in discus; state finals in shot-put;
  • Cameron Jordan (eight sacks last year for Saints), state champ (AZ) in discus;
  • Sam Acho (starting ROLB for Horton’s Cardinals), state champ (TX) in discus and shot put;
  • Jabaal Sheard, 4th in state (FL) in shot put, also threw discus;
  • JJ Watt, state champ (WI) shot-put.

    Screen Shot 2013-04-22 at 5.01.08 PM

    Projecting the foreign 5tech prospects.

Just saying, it’s a positive.  Speaking of positives, check his stats:  4.8 40, 35″ vert, 30x 225 bench reps on THIRTY-FIVE INCH ARMS.  Added bonus: his age can be confirmed to be 21.  From Gil Brandt:  “Okoye looked like he could be drafted. He was unbelievably active and incredibly explosive in drills. It was a real, first-class show.”

Should also point out that the reigning top 5-tech DE (Watt) is a converted Tight End; this year’s top 5-tech DE prospect (Ansah) has been playing football for three years; this year’s third highest 5-tech prospect (Margus) has been playing football three year.  Why not this guy?  Especially if it just costs you a sixth rounder.  (more…)

Cleveland Schadenfreude.

Screen Shot 2013-04-20 at 1.00.32 AM

Assuming rejection of a ‘just following orders’ defense these people are criminals going to jail.
Still feeling great about your FBI?

.

In the midst of a rush to judgement concerning Jimmy Haslam, perhaps we can take a step back this weekend.  I’m not sharing any of the most common emotions I’ve seen expressed on this issue.  I hope I’m not the only one.

_____
What’s your deal Kanick?  After all, you helped kick this off.

When news of this raid broke I came down hard on Haslam and PFJ.  That was when I thought we were dealing with serious charges and naively thinking Justice was being used to effect a greater good.  Now it just looks like a power play of dubious value and born of questionable motivation.

In Tuesday’s post, I explored any number of probable outcomes that would cause government armed forces to enter forcibly a private enterprise, confiscate property, and first confine, then eject workers from corporate buildings.  IT. IS. A. SERIOUS. ASSERTION. OF. GOVERNMENT. AUTHORITY.  Breaking into a place of business with weapons brandished should only be used for good reason.  A ‘good reason’ being the serious criminal activities or white collar crimes on the scale of:

Screen Shot 2013-04-19 at 8.00.24 PM

Guess the company that was not raided this week!
Hint: this company’s business is not truck stops.
Hint: their operating margin is greater than 3%.
Hint: this company is not based in Knoxville, TN.

  • Enron, $25,000,000,000 in assets;
  • Lehman, $138,000,000,000 in Federally-backed advances;
  • AIG, $150,000,000,000 in FRBNY exposure and the life-or-death of GE and GM held through their Credit Default Swaps.

Were public or stockholder monies of that scale at risk and so forcing the drastic intervention?
Nope.  Hell, it couldn’t be a billion dollars, the company only made around $600,000,000 (against $29B in sales).  Not AIG here.

Ok then, maybe we’re dealing with the sex-slavery trade known to occur at truck-stops; FBI has been trying to clean that up.
Nope.

Bribing of public officials in return for sweetheart land development schemes?
Unh-uh.

Price gouging?
No.

What this raid was about (ostensibly) is your government prosecuting PFJ for shorting their customers in a rebate program.  The sum total of the missing rebates is not known, Kanick wagers that it will be under $10,000,000 over five years.

Small potatoes.  Small potatoes with just a whiff of caveat emptor that might apply to the customers; how do they not know what they’re supposed to be getting back?

Screen Shot 2013-04-19 at 4.45.48 PM

Nothing says criminal high-finance fraud like a mustard bungalow in Nashville.
(FBI served warrant here… this a target.)

A crime, to be sure.  But there are levels of crime magnitude; discretion on what is and is not prosecuted;  how the prosecution is executed.  Discretion plays a key role; not everything is enforced in the same way.  Anyone bet on the Masters last weekend?  Ok, that’s almost all of you… anyone have 30 cops break in and take your hard drives?  Right, thought not.  Levels of magnitude.  Prosecutorial discretion.  

Was any used here?

The way this played out was the FBI scaring the shit out people who are pretty much just doing their job.  (Even Haslam was rattled as you could tell when the ‘candidly’ meter clicked nine times yesterday.)  The women pictured above are named prominently in the affidavit.  One is the pricing coordinator, two are inside sales people who support outside reps.  These are the people who actually applied the rebates. They’re the ‘good Germans’ who were ‘just following orders.’  Think that’ll fly with the FBI or AG?  Think you’d feel good having your future held in the hands of either agency?  I wouldn’t.

Bet these women never saw this coming when they got their jobs which I’m guessing pays south of 30k/yr. (more…)